Monoatomic Science

microcluster

Nuclear physicists discovered in 1989 that the atoms of some elements exist in microclusters. These are tiny groups of two to several hundred atoms. Most of the transition group noble metals in the center of the periodic diagram are in a monatomic state. When you have more than a certain number of these atoms in a microcluster, the atoms combine into a lattice structure with metallic properties. If you have fewer than this critical number of atoms, this microcluster will break down into monatomic atoms with ceramic properties. Monatomic atoms are not held in place by sharing electrons with their neighboring atoms, like atoms in a classical lattice structure. The critical number of atoms for rhodium is 9 and the critical number of atoms for gold is 2. The meaning of this is that if you have two or more gold atoms in a microcluster, it will exhibit metallic properties. However, if you have 9 or fewer atoms in a microcluster of rhodium atoms, the microcluster will spontaneously break down into a group of monatomic rhodium atoms. You may be wondering why there is one state of equilibrium at a given strain and another state of equilibrium at a different plane of strain. Nuclear scientists need to think about that. why there is one state of equilibrium at a given strain and another state of equilibrium at a different plane of strain. Nuclear scientists need to think about that. why there is one state of equilibrium at a given strain and another state of equilibrium at a different plane of strain. Nuclear scientists need to think about that.

It has been observed that the valence electrons of monatomic elements are not available for chemical reactions. This means that monatomic atoms are chemically inert and exhibit many of the physical properties of ceramic materials. Because the valence electrons are not available, it is impossible to use standard analytical chemistry techniques to identify a monatomic element. After reading the above statement, an observer remarked that the statement was not entirely true. He says, "There's a kind of shadow chemistry that's still working on monatomic elements." David Hudson speaks of the same color changes in monoatomic chemistry as in metallic chemistry. According to alchemical understanding, I suspect that similar chemical reactions are still occurring but at a greatly reduced rate. In other words, a chemical process that takes a few days with metallic chemistry can take months or years with this "shadow chemistry". For consistency, perhaps we could refer to "shadow chemistry" as "alchemy". What the observer says may be true, but it does not explain the physical mechanism at work. Are the valence electrons unavailable for reactions in monatomic elements or not? Even simply assigning a name to a phenomenon does not explain the phenomenon. For consistency, perhaps we could refer to "shadow chemistry" as "alchemy". What the observer says may be true, but it does not explain the physical mechanism at work. Are the valence electrons unavailable for reactions in monatomic elements or not? Even simply assigning a name to a phenomenon does not explain the phenomenon. For consistency, perhaps we could refer to "shadow chemistry" as "alchemy". What the observer says may be true, but it does not explain the physical mechanism at work. Are the valence electrons unavailable for reactions in monatomic elements or not? Even simply assigning a name to a phenomenon does not explain the phenomenon. .

These are very recent discoveries and the full implications have yet to be evaluated by the scientific community. You won't find this in textbooks yet. In general, a metallic element is physically stable, is a relatively good conductor of heat and electricity, and is usually chemically active. (Metals typically rust and/or corrode.) On the contrary, monatomic atoms of the same element behave more like ceramics, being generally poor conductors of both heat and electricity and chemically inert. In addition, according to Hudson, monatomic elements exhibit the properties of superconductors at room temperature. Russian scientists at the Institute of Mineralogy, Geochemistry and Crystal Chemistry of Rare Earths in Kiev explicitly state in their literature, that atoms in lattice structures are metallic in character and that the same atoms in the monoatomic state are ceramic in character. dr However, Kogan from the institute does not endorse all of Hudson's findings as being scientifically sound. It would be worthwhile if we could get a detailed critique of Hudson's work from this institute. .

Monoatomic atoms have been observed in all of the heavy elements in the middle of the periodic table. These are the elements that contain "half-filled" bands of valence electrons and the following elements. Their atomic numbers are given in parentheses (the atomic number represents the number of protons in the nucleus.) Ruthenium (44), Rhodium (45), Palladium (46), Silver (47), Osmium (76), Iridium (77), Platinum (78) and Gold (79). Other metallic elements in the same part of the periodic table have been observed in microclusters. Since the atoms of the monatomic elements are not held in a rigid lattice network, their physical properties differ significantly from atoms locked in the lattice. So it is the grouping of atoms that defines the physical properties of the element; not just the number of neutrons and protons in the nucleus, as previously thought. If you don't have a grid, you don't have metal, even though the atoms of the two forms of matter are identical! The implication here is that there is an entirely new phase of matter lurking across the universe. This form (phase) of matter consists of monatomic elements; a hitherto unknown form (phase) of matter. They have remained unknown for so long because they are inert and undetectable by normal analytical techniques. This might be nothing more than scientific curiosity, other than the fact that Hudson now claims that a relatively large amount of this previously undiscovered monatomic matter appears to exist in the Earth's crust. If you don't have a grid, you don't have metal, even though the atoms of the two forms of matter are identical! The implication here is that there is an entirely new phase of matter lurking across the universe. This form (phase) of matter consists of monatomic elements; a hitherto unknown form (phase) of matter. They have remained unknown for so long because they are inert and undetectable by normal analytical techniques. This might be nothing more than scientific curiosity, other than the fact that Hudson now claims that a relatively large amount of this previously undiscovered monatomic matter appears to exist in the Earth's crust. If you don't have a grid, you don't have metal, even though the atoms of the two forms of matter are identical! The implication here is that there is an entirely new phase of matter lurking across the universe. This form (phase) of matter consists of monatomic elements; a hitherto unknown form (phase) of matter. They have remained unknown for so long because they are inert and undetectable by normal analytical techniques. This might be nothing more than scientific curiosity, other than the fact that Hudson now claims that a relatively large amount of this previously undiscovered monatomic matter appears to exist in the Earth's crust. lurking across the universe. This form (phase) of matter consists of monatomic elements; a hitherto unknown form (phase) of matter. They have remained unknown for so long because they are inert and undetectable by normal analytical techniques. This might be nothing more than scientific curiosity, other than the fact that Hudson now claims that a relatively large amount of this previously undiscovered monatomic matter appears to exist in the Earth's crust. lurking across the universe. This form (phase) of matter consists of monatomic elements; a hitherto unknown form (phase) of matter. They have remained unknown for so long because they are inert and undetectable by normal analytical techniques. This might be nothing more than scientific curiosity, other than the fact that Hudson now claims that a relatively large amount of this previously undiscovered monatomic matter appears to exist in the Earth's crust. .

Frontiers of analytical chemistry

The implication here is that there is an entirely new phase of matter lurking about the universe. This form (phase) of matter consists of monatomic elements; a hitherto unknown form (phase) of matter. They have remained unknown for so long because they are inert and undetectable using normal analytical methods.

This might just be a scientific curiosity, other than the fact that Hudson now claims that a relatively large amount of this previously undiscovered monatomic matter appears to exist in the Earth's crust. How is it that a small percentage of Earth's matter is made up of material that has so far remained completely undiscovered? It has to do with the theory of analytical chemistry. None of the analytical chemistry detection methods can detect monatomic elements. You can only detect elements by interacting with their valence electrons. Because the valence electrons of monatomic atoms are not available, the atoms are unidentifiable. In order to detect a monoatomic element, one must first convert it from its monatomic state to its normal state so that the element can be detected with conventional instruments. As a result, this phase of matter exists as stealth material right under the noses of scientists, undiscovered until recently. .

Peculiarities of the monoatomic elements

The monatomic form of an element exhibits physical properties entirely different from its metallic form. These differences are currently being studied by nuclear physicists, so it is not possible to make an exhaustive list of the differences. Some of the differences are noted. Classic literature states that the white powder has a fluorescent glow. Hudson says that this powder behaves like a superconductor at room temperature, giving it very interesting properties. Being a superconductor, it tends to "ride" the Earth's magnetic field, giving it the power of levitation. It has turned out that it is very difficult to determine the specific gravity of the monatomic elements, since the weight varies greatly with temperature and magnetic environment. Under certain circumstances, monatomic elements weigh less than zero! That is, a container full of monoatomic matter could weigh less than the empty container. .